GBlogo


General Biomass
  HOME
ABOUT US
SUSTAINABILITY
 AVIATION BIOFUEL
 TECHNOLOGY
 INVESTORS
NEWS & EVENTS
Small Ethanol Plants

Smaller ethanol plants built with advanced technology could stimulate the growth and development of cellulosic ethanol in a wide variety of communities with a wider selection of biomass feedstocks.

Biomass or cellulosic ethanol plants operate differently from corn ethanol plants. The differences between these two types of ethanol plants have to do with the chemical structure of biomass and its distribution. Biomass is less dense than corn, and most biomass feedstocks yield less glucose per ton than corn grain. These density and compositional differences have an impact on the design and cost of cellulosic ethanol plants. The lower density of biomass means that a greater volume of biomass is needed to make the same volume of ethanol, as compared to corn. For example, a given volume of cellulosic ethanol requires 27 volumes of switchgrass, compared to 3.6 volumes of corn grain. This feedstock volume problem works against the standard engineering assumption of economies of scale, i.e., larger plants require more biomass feedstock which must be transported from longer distances, increasing delivered feedstock costs and the greenhouse gases generated by feedstock transportation. Economies of scale are valid, but must now be balanced against the operating costs of feedstock transportation, feedstock availability at the plant, and overall greenhouse gas balance of the operation.

The biomass density problem raises the possibility that smaller ethanol plants may have a role in rural, forest and urban economies. Small plants are a better fit where local biomass feedstocks are limited in quantity. The number of such sites is far greater than the number of sites which could potentially support large bioethanol plants.

Another current barrier for cellulosic ethanol plants is their higher capital cost per annual gallon compared to corn ethanol plants. These higher capital costs are the result of the the need for pretreatment of biomass to expose the cellulose for enzymatic conversion to glucose, and to extract hemicellulose which potentially can be converted to sugars like xylose for additional ethanol production. Additionally, cellulosic ethanol plants may contain lignin burners and boilers which can lower net fossil energy use, but add to the plant cost. A rough comparison is that with current technology, corn ethanol plants cost U.S. $2.00 per annual gallon, or about $60 million for a 30 million gallon corn ethanol plant. In contrast, cellulosic ethanol plants may cost $6-10 or more per annual gallon.

One approach to this problem is to build larger cellulosic ethanol plants and reduce capital costs through economies of scale. An alternative approach outlined here would be to reduce capital costs per gallon with improved technology, allowing the construction of smaller cellulosic ethanol or biosugar plants with lower capital hurdle rates. Such smaller plants would be a better fit for localized sources of biomass, which are more numerous in Asia, North America, Europe and other regions. In addition, better biomass deconstruction enzymes made by General Biomass and our cellulosic bioreactor technology can make cheaper sugars from low cost nonfood feedstocks such as ag residues, MSW, forest residues, or peripheral biomass from fruits, palm and coffee beans. These nonfood sugars are the foundation of new industries like bioplastics for sustainable packaging.

This has implications for U.S. energy policy and the implementation of the Energy Policy Act. See the  cellulosic ethanol paper from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) for policy recommendations. These issues are also discussed in our paper and House testimony on cellulosic ethanol.

Biomass is an abundant and underutilized resource which remains to be effectively used on a commercial and societal scale.  Green plants produce an estimated 1 trillion metric tons of cellulose every year. Using even a fraction of this for fuel ethanol, butanol, green chemicals and bioplastics could begin to reduce our yearly addition of more fossil carbon to the atmosphere, slowing the increase in global warming, and providing additional domestic energy supplies and jobs.  Worldwide, the use of biomass could provide social and economic benefits to many countries and reduce their dependence on imported oil, while lowering their emissions of CO2 from fossil carbon.

General Biomass offers scientific and technical consulting for cellulosic technology, biorefineries, and production of fuels, chemicals and bioplastics from biomass. We bring a deep knowledge of biomass feedstock chemistry, biomass deconstruction enzymes, genomics and bioinformatics, biomass conversion technologies, and the practical economics of nonfood sugar intermediates and lignin production from biomass.

We work with customers to create value chain technologies for sustainable packaging in the food and beverage industries, ethanol, butanol and biojet producers who want to utilize cellulosic feedstocks, and companies who want to turn waste problems into sustainable GHG-reducing solutions.

General Biomass Company
2906 Central Street, #134
Evanston, IL 60201
U.S.A.
 
Email: dgibbs@generalbiomass.com
Phone: 847-624-3590
@drbiomass


<--Back to the top of the Page

Copyright 2013 by General Biomass Company. All Rights Reserved.